Solution Found!
Evolutionary Implications of Cytochromes vs. Hemoglobin and Myoglobin
Chapter 20, Problem 23(choose chapter or problem)
Questions & Answers
QUESTION: Reflect on the evolutionary implications of the structural similarities and functional differences of cytochromes on the one hand and hemoglobin and myoglobin on the other.
ANSWER:Step 1 of 3
Evolutionarily, identical structures or structures close to identical can perform two different functions, with only minor differences in the protein moieties. The organism saves considerable energy by not having to evolve—and operate—two pathways.
Cytochromes, hemoglobin, and myoglobin are all heme-containing proteins that play vital roles in biological systems. Despite their structural similarities, these proteins have evolved to fulfill distinct functions, reflecting the dynamic nature of evolution and the optimization of biological processes over time.
Structurally, cytochromes, hemoglobin, and myoglobin share a common core composed of a heme group consisting of a porphyrin ring with an iron ion at its center. This structural similarity indicates a common ancestral origin, likely originating from a common progenitor protein. The conservation of this core structure throughout evolution suggests its importance in facilitating specific biochemical functions.
Watch The Answer!
Evolutionary Implications of Cytochromes vs. Hemoglobin and Myoglobin
Want To Learn More? To watch the entire video and ALL of the videos in the series:
In this video, we delve into the fascinating world of evolutionary adaptations in heme-containing proteins.