Solution Found!

Solved: You Explain It! Winning Percentage and On-base

Chapter 3, Problem 15AYU

(choose chapter or problem)

Get Unlimited Answers
QUESTION:

You Explain It! Winning Percentage and On-base Percentage  In his best-selling book Moneyball, author Michael Lewis discusses how statistics can be used to judge both a baseball player’s potential and a team’s ability to win games. One aspect of this analysis is that a team’s on-base percentage is the best predictor of winning percentage. The on-base percentage is the proportion of time a player reaches a base. For example, an on-base percentage of 0.3 would mean the player safely reaches bases 3 times out of 10, on average. For the 2010 baseball season, winning percentage, y, and on-base percentage, x, are linearly related by the least-squares regression equation \(\hat {y}= 3.4722 x – 0.6294\).

(a) Interpret the slope.

(b) For 2010, the lowest on-base percentage was 0.298 and the highest on-base percentage was 0.350. Use this information to explain why it does not make sense to interpret the y-intercept.

(c) Would it be a good idea to use this model to predict the winning percentage of a team whose on-base percentage was 0.250? Why or why not?

(d) The 2010 World Series Champion San Francisco Giants had an on-base percentage of 0.321 and a winning percentage of 0.568. What is the residual for San Francisco? How would you interpret this residual?

Questions & Answers

QUESTION:

You Explain It! Winning Percentage and On-base Percentage  In his best-selling book Moneyball, author Michael Lewis discusses how statistics can be used to judge both a baseball player’s potential and a team’s ability to win games. One aspect of this analysis is that a team’s on-base percentage is the best predictor of winning percentage. The on-base percentage is the proportion of time a player reaches a base. For example, an on-base percentage of 0.3 would mean the player safely reaches bases 3 times out of 10, on average. For the 2010 baseball season, winning percentage, y, and on-base percentage, x, are linearly related by the least-squares regression equation \(\hat {y}= 3.4722 x – 0.6294\).

(a) Interpret the slope.

(b) For 2010, the lowest on-base percentage was 0.298 and the highest on-base percentage was 0.350. Use this information to explain why it does not make sense to interpret the y-intercept.

(c) Would it be a good idea to use this model to predict the winning percentage of a team whose on-base percentage was 0.250? Why or why not?

(d) The 2010 World Series Champion San Francisco Giants had an on-base percentage of 0.321 and a winning percentage of 0.568. What is the residual for San Francisco? How would you interpret this residual?

ANSWER:

Step 1 of 4

(a)

The equation of the least-squares regression line for 2010 baseball season, winning percentage, y, and on-base percentage, x is,

The slope of the least-squares regression line is the coefficient of on-base percentage, x:

For each percentage point increase in on-base percentage, the winning percentage will increase by 3.4722 percentage points, on average.

Add to cart


Study Tools You Might Need

Not The Solution You Need? Search for Your Answer Here:

×

Login

Login or Sign up for access to all of our study tools and educational content!

Forgot password?
Register Now

×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back