The article Computer-Assisted Instruction Augmented with

Chapter 10, Problem 10.36

(choose chapter or problem)

The article Computer-Assisted Instruction Augmented with Planned Teacher/Student Contacts (J. Exp. Educ., Winter, 19801981: 120126) compared five different methods for teaching descriptive statistics. The five methods were traditional lecture and discussion (L/D), programmed textbook instruction (R), programmed text with lectures (R/L), computer instruction (C), and computer instruction with lectures (C/L). Forty-five students were randomly assigned, 9 to each method. After completing the course, the students took a 1-hour exam. In addition, a 10-minute retention test was administered 6 weeks later. Summary quantities are given. Exam Retention TestMethod xisi xisiL/D 29.3 4.99 30.20 3.82R 28.0 5.33 28.80 5.26R/L 30.2 3.33 26.20 4.66C 32.4 2.94 31.10 4.91C/L 34.2 2.74 30.20 3.53The grand mean for the exam was 30.82, and the grandmean for the retention test was 29.30.a. Does the data suggest that there is a difference among thefive teaching methods with respect to true mean examscore? Use .05.b. Using a .05 significance level, test the null hypothesis ofno difference among the true mean retention test scoresfor the five different teaching methods.

Unfortunately, we don't have that question answered yet. But you can get it answered in just 5 hours by Logging in or Becoming a subscriber.

Becoming a subscriber
Or look for another answer

×

Login

Login or Sign up for access to all of our study tools and educational content!

Forgot password?
Register Now

×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back