Suppose that to mitigate the effects of secondary clustering we use as the
Chapter 5, Problem 5.11(choose chapter or problem)
Suppose that to mitigate the effects of secondary clustering we use as the collisionresolution function f(i) = i r(hash(x)), where hash(x) is the 32-bit hash value(not yet scaled to a suitable array index), and r(y) = |48271y( mod (231 1))|mod TableSize. (Section 10.4.1 describes a method of performing this calculationwithout overflows, but it is unlikely that overflow matters in this case.) Explainwhy this strategy tends to avoid secondary clustering, and compare this strategywith both double hashing and quadratic probing
Unfortunately, we don't have that question answered yet. But you can get it answered in just 5 hours by Logging in or Becoming a subscriber.
Becoming a subscriber
Or look for another answer