The creationists have no right to impose their mistaken, ignorant, superstitious beliefs | StudySoup
A Concise Introduction to Logic | 12th Edition | ISBN: 9781285196541 | Authors: Patrick J. Hurley

Table of Contents

1.1
Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
1.2
Recognizing Arguments
1.3
Deduction and Induction
1.4
Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency
1.5
Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity
1.6
Extended Arguments

2.1
Varieties of Meaning
2.2
The Intension and Extension of Terms
2.3
Definitions and Their Purposes
2.4
Definitional Techniques
2.5
Criteria for Lexical Definitions

3.1
Fallacies in General
3.2
Fallacies of Relevance
3.3
Fallacies of Weak Induction
3.4
Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Illicit Transference
3.5
Fallacies in Ordinary Language

4.1
The Components of Categorical Propositions
4.2
Quality, Quantity, and Distribution
4.3
Venn Diagrams and the Modern Square of Opposition
4.4
Conversion, Obversion, and Contraposition
4.5
The Traditional Square of Opposition
4.6
Venn Diagrams and the Traditional Standpoint
4.7
Translating Ordinary Language Statements into Categorical Form

5.1
Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
5.2
Venn Diagrams
5.3
Rules and Fallacies
5.4
Reducing the Number of Terms
5.5
Ordinary Language Arguments
5.6
Enthymemes
5.7
Sorites

6.1
Symbols and Translation
6.2
Truth Functions
6.3
Truth Tables for Propositions
6.4
Truth Tables for Arguments
6.5
Indirect Truth Tables
6.6
Argument Forms and Fallacies

7.1
Rules of Implication I
7.2
Rules of Implication II
7.3
Rules of Replacement I
7.4
Rules of Replacement II
7.5
Conditional Proof
7.6
Indirect Proof
7.7
Proving Logical Truths

8.1
Symbols and Translation
8.2
Using the Rules of Inference
8.3
Quantifier Negation Rule
8.4
Conditional and Indirect Proof
8.5
Proving Invalidity
8.6
Relational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers
8.7
Identity

9
Analogy and Legal and Moral Reasoning

10
Causality and Mills Methods

11
Probability

12
Statistical Reasoning

13
Hypothetical/Scientific Reasoning

14
Science and Superstition

Textbook Solutions for A Concise Introduction to Logic

Chapter 2.1 Problem 3

Question

The creationists have no right to impose their mistaken, ignorant, superstitious beliefs on others. They claim the constitutional right to the free exercise of religion. How about the rights of the majority of people who want their children taught the scientific truth about evolutionnot fallacious myths and superstitions from primitive societies.

Solution

II. The following selections were taken from the letters-to-the-editor section of a newspaper. Each can be interpreted as expressing one or more arguments. Begin by identifying the conclusion of each. Then disengage the covert assumptions, value claims, and other cognitive assertions from the emotive language and translate them into emotively neutral premises. Use the two examples in the text as models. Finally, evaluate the restructured arguments. Some may turn out to be good ones.

3. The creationists have no right to impose their mistaken, ignorant, superstitious beliefs on others. They claim the constitutional right to the free exercise of religion. How about the rights of the majority of people who want their children taught the scientific truth about evolution-not fallacious myths and superstitions from primitive societies.

 (Andrew M. Underhill, Jr.)

Step By Step Solutions

Step 1 of 2

The statements that make up an argument are divided into one or more premises and exactly one conclusion. The premises are the statements that set forth the reasons or evidence, and the conclusion is the statement that the evidence is claimed to support or imply. In other words, the conclusion is the statement that is claimed to follow from the premises.

Terminology that conveys information is said to have cognitive meaning, and terminology that expresses or evokes feelings is said to have emotive meaning.

A value claim is a claim that something is good, bad, right, wrong, better, worse, more important, or less important than some other thing.

A vague expression is one that allows for borderline cases in which it is impossible to tell if the expression applies or does not apply.

An ambiguous expression is one that can be interpreted as having more than one clearly distinct meaning in a given context.

Subscribe to view the
full solution

Title A Concise Introduction to Logic 12 
Author Patrick J. Hurley
ISBN 9781285196541

The creationists have no right to impose their mistaken, ignorant, superstitious beliefs

Chapter 2.1 textbook questions

×

Login

Organize all study tools for free

Or continue with
×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or continue with

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back