Solution Found!
Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following
Chapter 3, Problem 89E(choose chapter or problem)
Problem 89E
Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in 1963, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) conducted an official government investigation. The HSCA concluded that although there was a probable conspiracy involving at least one shooter in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald, the additional shooter missed all limousine occupants. A recent analysis of assassination bullet fragments, reported in the Annals of Applied Statistics (Vol. 1, 2007), contradicted these findings, concluding that the evidence used by the HSCA to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. It is well documented that at least two different bullets were the source of bullet fragments found after the assassination. Let E = {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T = {two bullets used in the aassassination}, and Tc = {more than two bullets used in the assassination}. Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurred—two bullets used (T) or more than two bullets used (Tc)?
a. The researchers demonstrated that the ratio, P(T|E) >P(Tc|E), is less than 1. Explain why this result supports the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination of JFK.
b. To obtain the result, part a, the researchers first showed that P(T |E)>P(Tc|E) = [P(E|T) = P(T)]> [P(E|Tc) = P(Tc)] Demonstrate this equality using Bayes’s Rule.
Questions & Answers
QUESTION:
Problem 89E
Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in 1963, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) conducted an official government investigation. The HSCA concluded that although there was a probable conspiracy involving at least one shooter in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald, the additional shooter missed all limousine occupants. A recent analysis of assassination bullet fragments, reported in the Annals of Applied Statistics (Vol. 1, 2007), contradicted these findings, concluding that the evidence used by the HSCA to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. It is well documented that at least two different bullets were the source of bullet fragments found after the assassination. Let E = {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T = {two bullets used in the aassassination}, and Tc = {more than two bullets used in the assassination}. Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurred—two bullets used (T) or more than two bullets used (Tc)?
a. The researchers demonstrated that the ratio, P(T|E) >P(Tc|E), is less than 1. Explain why this result supports the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination of JFK.
b. To obtain the result, part a, the researchers first showed that P(T |E)>P(Tc|E) = [P(E|T) = P(T)]> [P(E|Tc) = P(Tc)] Demonstrate this equality using Bayes’s Rule.
ANSWER:
Solution:
Step 1 of 3:
Let E = {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T = {two bullets used in the assassination}, and
Tc = {more than two bullets used in the assassination}.
Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurred-two bullets used(T) or more than two bullets used (Tc).
- We have to find why the result P(T/E) / P(Tc/E), is less than 1 support the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination.
- By using the bayes theorem,we have to prove P(T/E)> P(Tc/E) = [P(E/T)= P(T)]>[P(E/Tc)=P(Tc)].