The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2-year study to | StudySoup

Textbook Solutions for Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis (with CengageNOW Printed Access Card) (Available Titles CengageNOW)

Chapter 10 Problem 10.21

Question

The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2-year study to determine whether cancer death rates for areas near nuclear power plants are higher than for areas without nuclear facilities (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 17, 1990). A spokesperson for the Cancer Institute said, From the data at hand, there was no convincing evidence of any increased risk of death from any of the cancers surveyed due to living near nuclear facilities. However, no study can prove the absence of an effect. a. Let p denote the true proportion of the population in areas near nuclear power plants who die of cancer during a given year. The researchers at the Cancer Institute might have considered the two rival hypotheses of the form H0: p value for areas without nuclear facilities Ha: p value for areas without nuclear facilities Did the researchers reject H0 or fail to reject H0? b. If the Cancer Institute researchers were incorrect in their conclusion that there is no increased cancer risk associated with living near a nuclear power plant, are they making a Type I or a Type II error? Explain. c. Comment on the spokespersons last statement that no study can prove the absence of an effect. Do you agree with this statement?

Solution

Step 1 of 4)

The first step in solving 10 problem number 21 trying to solve the problem we have to refer to the textbook question: The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2-year study to determine whether cancer death rates for areas near nuclear power plants are higher than for areas without nuclear facilities (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 17, 1990). A spokesperson for the Cancer Institute said, From the data at hand, there was no convincing evidence of any increased risk of death from any of the cancers surveyed due to living near nuclear facilities. However, no study can prove the absence of an effect. a. Let p denote the true proportion of the population in areas near nuclear power plants who die of cancer during a given year. The researchers at the Cancer Institute might have considered the two rival hypotheses of the form H0: p value for areas without nuclear facilities Ha: p value for areas without nuclear facilities Did the researchers reject H0 or fail to reject H0? b. If the Cancer Institute researchers were incorrect in their conclusion that there is no increased cancer risk associated with living near a nuclear power plant, are they making a Type I or a Type II error? Explain. c. Comment on the spokespersons last statement that no study can prove the absence of an effect. Do you agree with this statement?
From the textbook chapter Hypothesis Testing Using a Single Sample you will find a few key concepts needed to solve this.

Step 2 of 7)

Visible to paid subscribers only

Step 3 of 7)

Visible to paid subscribers only

Subscribe to view the
full solution

Title Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis (with CengageNOW Printed Access Card) (Available Titles CengageNOW) 3 
Author Roxy Peck, Chris Olsen, Jay L. Devore
ISBN 9780495118732

The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2-year study to

Chapter 10 textbook questions

×

Login

Organize all study tools for free

Or continue with
×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or continue with

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back