The survey of Chase and Dummer (1992) discussed in Exercise 1 of Sec. 10.3 was actually collected by sampling from three subpopulations according to the locations of the schools: rural, suburban, and urban. Table 10.24 shows the responses to the survey question classified by school location. Test the null hypothesis that the distribution of responses is the same in all three types of school location. Table 10.24 Data for Exercise 1 from Chase and Dummer (1992) Good Athletic grades ability Popularity Rural 57 42 50 Suburban 87 22 42 Urban 103 2
Read moreTable of Contents
Textbook Solutions for Probability and Statistics
Question
A manufacturing plant has preliminary contracts with three different suppliers of machines. Each supplier delivered 15 machines, which were used in the plant for four months in preliminary production. It turned out that one of the machines from supplier 1 was defective, seven of the machines from supplier 2 were defective, and seven of the machines from supplier 3 were defective. The plant statistician decided to test the null hypothesis H0 that the three suppliers provided the same quality. Therefore, he set up Table 10.28 and carried out a 2 test. By summing the values in the bottom row of Table 10.28, he found that the value of the 2 statistic was 24/5 with two degrees of freedom. He then found from a table of the 2 distribution that H0 should be accepted when the level of significance is 0.05. Criticize this procedure and provide a meaningful analysis of the observed data. Table 10.28 Data for Exercise 5 Supplier 1 23 Number of defectives Ni 1 77 Expected number of defe
Solution
The first step in solving 10.4 problem number 5 trying to solve the problem we have to refer to the textbook question: A manufacturing plant has preliminary contracts with three different suppliers of machines. Each supplier delivered 15 machines, which were used in the plant for four months in preliminary production. It turned out that one of the machines from supplier 1 was defective, seven of the machines from supplier 2 were defective, and seven of the machines from supplier 3 were defective. The plant statistician decided to test the null hypothesis H0 that the three suppliers provided the same quality. Therefore, he set up Table 10.28 and carried out a 2 test. By summing the values in the bottom row of Table 10.28, he found that the value of the 2 statistic was 24/5 with two degrees of freedom. He then found from a table of the 2 distribution that H0 should be accepted when the level of significance is 0.05. Criticize this procedure and provide a meaningful analysis of the observed data. Table 10.28 Data for Exercise 5 Supplier 1 23 Number of defectives Ni 1 77 Expected number of defe
From the textbook chapter Categorical Data and Nonparametric Methods you will find a few key concepts needed to solve this.
Visible to paid subscribers only
Step 3 of 7)Visible to paid subscribers only
full solution